Insurance Regulation and the Global Financial Crisis: A Problem of Low Probability Events

Christopher O'Brien

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2010, vol. 35, issue 1, 35-52

Abstract: We consider probabilistic approaches and stress tests as methods for regulators to set the minimum solvency margin for insurers. Each method has advantages and disadvantages. We assess the implications of the global financial crisis for each method, concentrating on life insurers. We have concerns that the probabilities used in probabilistic approaches are not robust. Regulators may find it beneficial to focus on the use of stress tests, although there are lessons to learn from the global financial crisis about the design and use of such tests.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v35/n1/pdf/gpp200936a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v35/n1/full/gpp200936a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:35:y:2010:i:1:p:35-52

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41288/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice is currently edited by Christophe Courbage

More articles in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice from Palgrave Macmillan, The Geneva Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().