Are All Summary Indicators of the Stance of Fiscal Policy Misleading?

G. A. Mackenzie
Additional contact information
G. A. Mackenzie: International Monetary Fund

IMF Staff Papers, 1989, vol. 36, issue 4, 743-770

Abstract: Two recent criticisms of summary fiscal indicators are appraised: first, that they and the conventionally measured public sector balances from which they are derived are not sufficiently broadly defined; second, that they are meaningless because they do not reflect changes in the distribution of wealth between generations. The paper concludes that the defects of summary fiscal indicators have been exaggerated. It is not feasible to include all changes in public sector net worth in the deficit, and the existence of liquidity constraints and aversion to indebtedness imply that conventionally measured public sector deficits are not irrelevant.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3867239?origin=pubexport main text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:imfstp:v:36:y:1989:i:4:p:743-770

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/41308/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in IMF Staff Papers from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().