Regional Trade Agreements or Broad Liberalization: Which Path Leads to Faster Growth?

Athanasios Vamvakidis
Additional contact information
Athanasios Vamvakidis: International Monetary Fund

IMF Staff Papers, 1999, vol. 46, issue 1, 3

Abstract: Should a closed economy open its trade to all countries or limit itself to participation in regional trade agreements (RTAs)? Based on time-series evidence for a data set for 1950-92, this paper estimates and compares the growth performance of countries that liberalized broadly and that of those that joined an RTA. The comparisons show that economies grew faster after broad liberalization, in both the short and the long run, but slower after participation in an RTA. Economies also had higher investment shares after broad liberalization, but lower ones after joining an RTA. The policy implications support broad liberalization. Copyright 1999, International Monetary Fund

JEL-codes: F43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (48)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/staffp/1999/03-99/pdf/vamvakid.pdf main text (application/pdf)
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/staffp/1999/03-99/v46n1a3.csv supplementary data (text/plain)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:imfstp:v:46:y:1999:i:1:p:3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/41308/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in IMF Staff Papers from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().