The regulation of high-frequency trading: A pragmatic view
Journal of Banking Regulation, 2015, vol. 16, issue 1, 72-88
High-frequency trading (HFT) has become a household term and a favourite topic for the financial media since the flash crash of May 2010. In this article, it is argued that the criticism directed at HFT is misplaced and based on a misconception of what HFT is all about. Specifically it is argued that HFT did not cause or exacerbate the flash crash, that it is not as profitable as it is typically portrayed to be, and that it is confused with other operations. Counterarguments are presented against the arguments put forward by the opponents of HFT. Although the case for a special regulation of HFT is weak, abusive practices such as ‘front running’ should be banned, whether they are associated with high-frequency or low-frequency traders. More importantly, however, there are more serious matters that regulators should be preoccupied with than traders who buy and sell frequently.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jbr/journal/v16/n1/pdf/jbr201322a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jbr/journal/v16/n1/full/jbr201322a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:16:y:2015:i:1:p:72-88
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Banking Regulation is currently edited by Dalvinder Singh
More articles in Journal of Banking Regulation from Palgrave Macmillan
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla ().