The hubris of excessive remuneration in the financial sector: The case for regulation
Imad A. Moosa ()
Additional contact information
Imad A. Moosa: RMIT
Journal of Banking Regulation, 2017, vol. 18, issue 4, 287-301
Abstract A case is put for the regulation of excessive remuneration in the financial sector in its three forms: basic pay, bonuses and golden parachutes. It is suggested that the financial sector commands a big portion of corporate profit that is disproportional to its share of the economy, which invalidates the profitability argument for big pay. It is demonstrated that bonuses and golden parachutes have nothing to do with performance and that for too-big-to-fail institutions, bonus payments are more strongly correlated with bail-out money than performance, no matter how performance is measured. The arguments against the regulation of remuneration are rebutted. It is concluded that a radical solution to the problem associated with big pay is to place the financial sector where it should be by putting an end to excessive financialisation.
Keywords: remuneration; financial regulation; bonus culture; golden parachutes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41261-016-0027-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:18:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1057_s41261-016-0027-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Banking Regulation is currently edited by Dalvinder Singh
More articles in Journal of Banking Regulation from Palgrave Macmillan
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla ().