Financing the orderly transition to a low carbon economy in the EU: the regulatory framework for the banking channel

María J. Nieto () and Chryssa Papathanassiou ()
Additional contact information
María J. Nieto: Bank of Spain
Chryssa Papathanassiou: EBS Law School

Journal of Banking Regulation, 2024, vol. 25, issue 2, No 2, 112-126

Abstract: Abstract Among the largest economies of the world, the EU not only has set the most ambitious and legally binding objectives for the reduction of the GHG emissions but also it has accompanied these objectives with a “state of the art” regulatory framework in the realms of investor protection and safety and soundness. Our paper focuses on the bank financing channel and highlights regulatory areas for improvement. To mobilize the necessary funds worldwide, a degree of interoperability of regional taxonomies is required, which calls for international cross-pollination and coordination to mitigate financial risks and the risk of harmful market fragmentation (BCBS 2022, FSB 2022). Also, the full interoperability between the international and the EU corporate reporting standards is a desirable objective. A building bloc methodological approach would make such interoperability easier having the sustainability impact perspective of the “double materiality objective” as an additional layer of the international requirements well understood to all investors in EU undertakings. As per the inclusion of climate risks in prudential regulation, it is completed for Pillar 3 disclosures relating effectively with the EU Taxonomy. Climate risk’s long-term horizon still needs to be implemented in Pillar 2 by linking bank transition plans with stress testing based on climate risk scenario analysis covering both transition and physical risk. The inclusion of climate risks in Pillar 1 faces challenges similar to those of supervisors internationally. Fostering global ambition is an explicit objective of the EU. Its leadership on the realms of investor protection and prudential regulation of climate risks should ideally inform international cooperation and impregnate international standards. This will secure that investments for the fulfillment of the EU climate objectives will flow from in and outside the EU.

Keywords: ESG; Climate risk; Banking supervision; G21; K23; O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41261-023-00219-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:25:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1057_s41261-023-00219-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41261/PS2

DOI: 10.1057/s41261-023-00219-6

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Banking Regulation is currently edited by Dalvinder Singh

More articles in Journal of Banking Regulation from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().