Fifty years of methodological trends in JIBS: Why future IB research needs more triangulation

Bo Bernhard Nielsen (), Catherine Welch (), Agnieszka Chidlow (), Stewart Robert Miller (), Roberta Aguzzoli (), Emma Gardner (), Maria Karafyllia () and Diletta Pegoraro ()
Additional contact information
Bo Bernhard Nielsen: University of Sydney Business School
Catherine Welch: University of Sydney Business School
Agnieszka Chidlow: University of Birmingham
Stewart Robert Miller: University of Texas at San Antonio
Roberta Aguzzoli: Durham University
Emma Gardner: University of Birmingham
Maria Karafyllia: University of Nottingham
Diletta Pegoraro: University of Birmingham

Journal of International Business Studies, 2020, vol. 51, issue 9, No 5, 1478-1499

Abstract: Abstract We analyze methodological trends in empirical research in JIBS from 1970 to 2019. Our results point to the prevalence of the following patterns: there has been an increase in the use of (1) large-scale longitudinal, cross-national datasets, (2) complex analytical techniques, including the incorporation of multiple analytical techniques within the same study, but (3) a decline in the diversity of methods in use. We relate these trends to the underlying social, technical, and communicative conventions in the journal during the 50-year period. The observed patterns are consistent with theory that posits scientific fields entrench a dominant paradigm over time, resulting in a restricted set of methodological options being selected. Such restrictions jeopardize the quality of research because the study of any phenomenon requires the use of multiple methodological procedures to avoid the systematic biases, errors, omissions, and limitations introduced by any single option. Therefore, we propose the use of triangulation as a strategy for building methodological alternatives into research designs. Institutionalization of this principle in the field of international business has the potential to enhance both the rigor and scope of future inquiry.

Keywords: triangulation; methodological rigor; methods diversity; methods complexity; IB paradigm; methodological bandwidth; methodological innovation; methodological trends (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (48)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41267-020-00372-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:51:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1057_s41267-020-00372-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/41267/PS2

DOI: 10.1057/s41267-020-00372-4

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Business Studies is currently edited by John Cantwell

More articles in Journal of International Business Studies from Palgrave Macmillan, Academy of International Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().