MNC response to superstitious practice in Myanmar IJVs: Understanding contested legitimacy, formal–informal legitimacy thresholds, and institutional disguise

Tim G. Andrews (), Khongphu Nimanandh (), Khin Thi Htun () and Orapin Santidhirakul ()
Additional contact information
Tim G. Andrews: Chiang Mai University
Khongphu Nimanandh: Chiang Mai University
Khin Thi Htun: Myanmar Women Entrepreneurs Association
Orapin Santidhirakul: Chiang Mai University

Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, vol. 53, issue 6, No 9, 1178-1201

Abstract: Abstract Superstition is a pervasive informal institution affecting the decision-making of organizational actors yet remains under-studied and ill-understood in international business research. We address this lacuna through examining how Western MNCs affect – and are affected by – the use of superstition among local subsidiary managers in an emerging Asian economy. Based on interviews, archival documents, and observation, our inductive investigation reveals a complex, changing, and surreptitious relationship between MNC practice and an informal institution which, while widely practiced, remains forbidden according to its formal institutional counterpart (Buddhism) and illegal according to Myanmar state law. Initial findings showed how MNCs endorsed, acquiesced, or rejected superstitious practice based on a configuration of construed reputational risk, corporate values adherence, degree of formal institution approval, and perceived local performance impact. Subsequent MNC engagement then shifted from accommodation to resistance to manipulation in response to local managers’ disguising their ‘superstitious’ practices as Buddhism, ‘blurring’ the formal–informal institution divide in the process to secure MNC public approval. Together, our findings serve to refine and deepen existing theory into how the MNC subunit can manage its legitimacy through balancing the incompatible demands of formal and informal constituents within a contested institutional dyad.

Keywords: informal institutions; superstition; legitimacy contestation; institutional disguise; multinational corporate subsidiary; qualitative case study; emerging market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41267-020-00377-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:53:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1057_s41267-020-00377-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/41267/PS2

DOI: 10.1057/s41267-020-00377-z

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Business Studies is currently edited by John Cantwell

More articles in Journal of International Business Studies from Palgrave Macmillan, Academy of International Business
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().