EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A modified procedure for synthesising ratio judgements in the analytic hierarchy process

Yeh J-M, C Lin (), B Kreng and Gee J-Y
Additional contact information
Yeh J-M: National Cheng Kung University
C Lin: National Cheng Kung University
B Kreng: National Cheng Kung University
Gee J-Y: National Cheng Kung University

Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1999, vol. 50, issue 8, 867-873

Abstract: Abstract The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely applied to solve problems arising in group decision making, by synthesising different or conflicting judgements. However, directly synthesising conflicting judgements by calculating the geometric mean of preference weights (ratios) in AHP may not reach consensus from all members in a decision making group, especially, when those members represent the stakeholders of the decision making problem. This study proposes a new method that uses the genetic algorithm and utility function to synthesise preference weights to prevent this fallacy occurring when implementing the classical AHP approach. Using the proposed method, the final decision can be achieved with only minimally-adjusted preference weights.

Keywords: analytic hierarchy process; synthesising ratio; genetic algorithm (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600768 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:50:y:1999:i:8:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600768

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... search/journal/41274

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600768

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Operational Research Society is currently edited by Tom Archibald and Jonathan Crook

More articles in Journal of the Operational Research Society from Palgrave Macmillan, The OR Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:50:y:1999:i:8:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600768