Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille

Marion Magnan () and Martijn Horst
Additional contact information
Marion Magnan: Sorbonne Université (FRE ENeC and UMR Géographie-Cités)
Martijn Horst: Erasmus University Rotterdam

Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2020, vol. 22, issue 1, No 5, 102-123

Abstract: Abstract Integration of inland and maritime logistics is vital for ports in the growing port competition landscape and for ports aspiring to be part of international logistics networks. In the present work, the question of how port authorities can play a role in the development of inland logistics markets has been addressed. Literature indicates that port authorities have an ideal position for intervention, but they often do not have suitable instruments to intervene beyond their traditional jurisdiction and mission. A typology based on the theoretical framework of Verhoeven [Marit Policy Manag 37(3):247–270, 2010], which categorises landlord port authorities as conservators, facilitators or entrepreneurs, along with their corresponding roles, types of actions and instruments has been introduced in this study. Three cases have been studied, namely Rotterdam (The Netherlands), Le Havre (France) and Marseille-Fos (France). The case studies rely on in-depth interviews with port authorities and public administrations to complete our desk research. The results of this study reveal a shift from a conservator to a facilitator model. Port authorities stimulate inland logistics markets through non-commercial incentives, such as organisational aid or subsidies, but they do not sell logistics services inland. In both dynamic (Rotterdam) and less dynamic hinterlands (Le Havre and Marseille-Fos), port authorities experience difficulties in assuming a more entrepreneurial behaviour, and a further shift towards the entrepreneurial model is not a likely trend. In this light, the thesis of Verhoeven (2010), concerning the renaissance of port authorities, can only be partially validated.

Keywords: Inland logistics; Hinterland; Port governance; Rotterdam; Le Havre; Marseille-Fos (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41278-019-00140-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:marecl:v:22:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41278-019-00140-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/41278/PS2

DOI: 10.1057/s41278-019-00140-8

Access Statistics for this article

Maritime Economics & Logistics is currently edited by Hercules E. Haralambides

More articles in Maritime Economics & Logistics from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().