Port Financing and Pricing in the European Union: Theory, Politics and Reality

H E Haralambides (), A Verbeke, E Musso and M Benacchio
Additional contact information
H E Haralambides: Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
A Verbeke: University of Brussels, Belgium
E Musso: University of Genoa, Italy
M Benacchio: University of Genoa, Italy

Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2001, vol. 3, issue 4, 368-386

Abstract: The issue of financing and pricing of port infrastructure has recently been the subject of widespread debate in Europe and it is now high on the political agenda of the European Union. This is the result of globalisation and the changing operational environment of ports, as well as of the increased port competition brought about by the completion of the internal market. Greater private sector interest in the port industry, as well as in the rest of Europe's infrastructure, necessitates some form of cost-based pricing that would allow the recovery of port investments. This could, however, disturb the existing ‘equilibrium’ among ports that has been established over the years as a result of each port's particular characteristics such as geographical location, proximity to markets, navigational constraints, subsidies and types of financing. Among competing container ports, like those of western Europe, such ‘disturbances’ can have marked impacts on ports' market shares, as a result of the easiness carriers can nowadays switch between ports. Furthermore, efficient pricing in the port sector could not bring about the expected welfare effects if the rest of the related infrastructure is not priced accordingly. The issue thus appears to be reaching a standstill, particularly in view of the fact that in most countries ports are considered as part of the country's infrastructure and thus State investment in ports is considered as ‘public investment’ outside the reach and mandate of the European Commission. The paper argues that the prime goal to be pursued at a European level is to achieve a level playing field among competing commercial seaports. It also reviews the past and present efforts of the European Commission in this area, the difficulties and challenges these efforts are faced with and, finally, it attempts to indicate the way forward; a way consistent with Europe's political thinking, priorities and realities.International Journal of Maritime Economics (2001) 3, 368–386. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ijme.9100026

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v3/n4/pdf/9100026a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v3/n4/full/9100026a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:marecl:v:3:y:2001:i:4:p:368-386

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/41278/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Maritime Economics & Logistics is currently edited by Hercules E. Haralambides

More articles in Maritime Economics & Logistics from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().