A country’s culture and reporting of sustainability practices in energy industries: does a corporate sustainability committee matter?

Ahmed Hassanein, Ahmed Bani-Mustafa and Khalil Nimer ()
Additional contact information
Ahmed Hassanein: Gulf University for Science and Technology
Ahmed Bani-Mustafa: Australian University
Khalil Nimer: Gulf University for Science and Technology

Palgrave Communications, 2024, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract This study investigates the impact of the national culture on the reporting of sustainability practices. Likewise, it explores the moderating effect of sustainability committees within firms on the nexus between a country’s cultural and sustainability reporting. The study uses a sample over a decade (2010–2019) from 18 countries. It employs six well-established cultural dimensions: power distance, Individualism, Masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation, and Indulgence. These dimensions are aggregated to create a composite cultural index score for each country, reflecting the nuanced interplay of cultural attributes. The sustainability reporting score is based on a firm Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores. The results reveal that reporting sustainability practices is a positive function of our country’s cultural index score. This indicates that a firm dissimilates higher levels of sustainability information when it operates in a country with a higher power distance, lower Individualism, higher Masculinity, higher uncertainty avoidance, higher long-term orientation, and lower Indulgence and vice versa. Likewise, a sustainability committee moderates the relationship between the national culture and sustainability reporting, suggesting that a corporate sustainability committee can act as a mechanism for aligning and adapting sustainability reporting practices to the specific cultural context in which a firm operates. The results provide essential implications for firms and policymakers. Firms should be aware of how cultural values shape their sustainability reporting. Also, a specialized sustainability committee navigates cultural complexities and aligns initiatives with expectations. Moreover, Policymakers should consider cultural influences and develop guidelines that accommodate variations, leading to more effective sustainability reporting. This study contributes by examining environmentally sensitive industries (i.e., the energy industries), providing industry-specific analysis that deepens our understanding of how a country’s culture shapes the reporting of sustainability practices. Likewise, the study uses a holistic approach, exploring the multifaceted dimensions of the country’s culture and its consequences for reporting sustainability practices.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03536-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03536-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03536-x

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().