Personal autonomy in memory modification technology: a critical assessment

Junjie Yang ()
Additional contact information
Junjie Yang: Peking University

Palgrave Communications, 2024, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-7

Abstract: Abstract Memory modification technology (MMT) refers to the use of neurotechnologies to intervene in memory. Some scholars oppose the application of MMT in mental health therapy because MMT undermines personal autonomy. Such judgment is based on several different reasons: (1) MMT is an inactive intervention; (2) MMT sacrifices long-term autonomy; (3) MMT promotes paternalism; (4) MMT leads users to relinquish their social relationships. This article argues that due to the philosophical complexities of the concept of autonomy, current debates have been unable to provide a valid justification for the ethical permissibility of MMT. In fact, the autonomy-based arguments against MMT focus on conceptual aspects of autonomy other than informed consent. A focus on informed consent may be of greater moral significance. We should adopt a more practical perspective of personal autonomy and focus on the informed consent issues in MMT.

Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03736-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03736-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03736-5

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().