EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Enhancing financial risk prediction with symbolic classifiers: addressing class imbalance and the accuracy–interpretability trade–off

Luis J. Mena, Vicente García (), Vanessa G. Félix, Rodolfo Ostos, Rafael Martínez-Peláez, Alberto Ochoa-Brust and Pablo Velarde-Alvarado
Additional contact information
Luis J. Mena: Universidad Politecnica de Sinaloa
Vicente García: Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez
Vanessa G. Félix: Universidad Politecnica de Sinaloa
Rodolfo Ostos: Universidad Politecnica de Sinaloa
Rafael Martínez-Peláez: Universidad Politecnica de Sinaloa
Alberto Ochoa-Brust: Universidad de Colima
Pablo Velarde-Alvarado: Universidad Autonoma de Nayarit

Palgrave Communications, 2024, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-11

Abstract: Abstract Machine learning for financial risk prediction has garnered substantial interest in recent decades. However, the class imbalance problem and the dilemma of accuracy gain by loss interpretability have yet to be widely studied. Symbolic classifiers have emerged as a promising solution for forecasting banking failures and estimating creditworthiness as it addresses class imbalance while maintaining both accuracy and interpretability. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of REMED, a symbolic classifier, in the context of financial risk management, and focuses on its ability to handle class imbalance and provide interpretable decision rules. Through empirical analysis of a real-world imbalanced financial dataset from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, we demonstrate that REMED effectively handles class imbalance, improving performance accuracy metrics while ensuring interpretability through a concise and easily understandable rule system. A comparative analysis is conducted against two well-known rule-generating approaches, J48 and JRip. The findings suggest that, with further development and validation, REMED can be implemented as a competitive approach to improve predictive accuracy on imbalanced financial datasets without compromising model interpretability.

Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04047-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04047-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04047-5

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04047-5