Participation in SoHO and ATMP public consultations: a fragmented institutional landscape

Michael Morrison, Valentin Brunel and Aurélie Mahalatchimy ()
Additional contact information
Michael Morrison: University of Oxford
Valentin Brunel: Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Aurélie Mahalatchimy: Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, DICE, CERIC

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: Abstract In the European Union (EU), the recent adoption of the Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) Regulation in June 2024 brings into force new harmonised rules for human cells, tissues and blood. This legislation interacts with the pre-existing Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) Regulation. This paper looks at the recent EU public consultations on the proposed SoHO Regulation and compares them with the prior consultations on the ATMP Regulation given the interplay between these two Acts. Information on each contributor to the three most recent consultations on SoHO and the two available consultations on the ATMP was collected, analysed, and used to develop a novel typology of entities participating in the consultations. This data set included the country of origin of each entity making a contribution and the type of entity involved (Academic/Research institutions, National Bodies, Companies, Business organizations, Patient and Consumer organizations, Learned Societies, Individual citizens, Networks/Innovation organizations, and Other Non-Governmental Organizations). The results show that the SoHO consultations attracted a far greater total volume of participants and displayed a greater variety of organizations from more distinct countries compared to the ATMP consultations. The most significant finding is the very low overlap in organisations making a contribution to both a SoHO and an ATMP consultations. This strongly suggests that there is significant institutional fragmentation between organisations collecting human biomaterials and organisations developing ATMP for market. Given that collection of biomaterials is a necessary first step in the development of most ATMP, European policy makers wishing to support ‘homegrown’ innovation with ATMP should give greater consideration to building better links between organisations collecting biomaterials and ATMP developers.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04552-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04552-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04552-1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().