Individual voices, collective health: a person-centered cross-sectional study to identify psychological drivers of vaccination attitudes

Giansanto Mosconi, Serena Barello, Paola Bertuccio, Marcello Fiorentino, Tomaso Vecchi and Anna Odone ()
Additional contact information
Giansanto Mosconi: University of Pavia
Serena Barello: University of Pavia
Paola Bertuccio: University of Pavia
Marcello Fiorentino: University of Pavia
Tomaso Vecchi: University of Pavia
Anna Odone: University of Pavia

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract Although existing research identifies different profiles of vaccine-hesitant individuals, most studies focus on isolated psychological constructs, neglecting their interplay in shaping vaccination attitudes. Using data from an online survey of a representative sample of Italian adults, we examined vaccination attitudes through a person-centered methodology. We selected personal values, attitudes, and beliefs for their potential relevance to vaccination attitudes and conducted an exploratory factor analysis to reveal the latent relationships among these variables. This approach allowed us to identify four underlying psychological drivers: Eco-humanism (altruistic/biospheric values and connectedness to nature), Skeptical Perspective (distrust in science, conspiracy mentality, and spirituality), Goal-Driven Positive Mindset (hope and optimism), and Self-Centered Attitude (hedonic/egoistic values). We then assessed how adherence to each driver related to vaccination attitudes, as measured by the VAX-I scale, using multiple linear and quantile regression models. Results showed that higher adherence to Eco-humanism resulted in more positive vaccination attitudes, particularly lower mistrust in vaccine benefits and reduced concerns about pharmaceutical companies’ profiteering. In contrast, a stronger alignment with the Skeptical Perspective was linked to more negative attitudes, including increased mistrust in vaccine benefits, heightened concerns about vaccine safety and pharmaceutical companies’ profiteering, and a greater preference for natural immunity. Likewise, higher adherence to Self-Centered Attitude was tied to an overall more negative stance, particularly marked by amplified worries about unforeseen long-term effects, heightened concerns about pharmaceutical companies’ profiteering, and an increased preference for natural immunity. Goal-Driven Positive Mindset, although not significantly associated with overall vaccination attitudes, was inversely related to mistrust in vaccine benefits. These findings suggest that vaccination attitudes are shaped by distinct psychological profiles, supporting the development of tailored, human-centered vaccine promotion strategies.

Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04834-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04834-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04834-8

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().