Research on whether low-carbon competition accelerates low-carbon transition and coordination strategies in the context of “dual carbon”

Huiqin Zhang, Deru Xie (), Jianmin Xie () and Yuxiang Zhang
Additional contact information
Huiqin Zhang: Chengdu University of Technology
Deru Xie: Chengdu University of Technology
Jianmin Xie: Southwest University of Science and Technology
Yuxiang Zhang: Chengdu University of Technology

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: Abstract This study explores low-carbon promotion competition between dual-channel green manufacturers and retailers against the backdrop of global low-carbon economic transformation and deepening green consumption preferences, aiming to uncover whether low-carbon competition drives the low-carbon transformation of supply chain enterprises. It also analyzes the equilibrium choices and coordination strategies of green manufacturers and retailers in low-carbon promotion competition. To achieve this, the study creates base models of centralized (C) and decentralized (D) low-carbon promotion competitions without government subsidies, followed by a low-carbon promotion competition model with government subsidies (DG). In the expanded models, a unilateral cost-sharing contract (CSG-S) and a bidirectional cost-sharing contract (CSG-D) are added to investigate supply chain collaborative optimization routes in low-carbon competitive settings. Finally, numerical simulations use fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) industry background data to support comparative analysis. Results show that green manufacturers have significant advantages in low-carbon promotion competition (under D and DG models). However, low-carbon competition can also moderately erode green brands’ profits, reputation, and emission reduction capabilities, impeding low-carbon transformation progress—there exists a risk of greenwashing in low-carbon promotion investments under competitive scenarios, but government low-carbon subsidies can further promote the reduction of carbon emission levels. As the DG, CSG-S, and CSG-D models gradually coordinate, the market demand gap between green manufacturers and retailers narrows, ultimately achieving mutual benefit among supply chain members, resolving low-carbon promotion competition conflicts, and facilitating synchronized development between low-carbon transformation and economic returns for both parties. This research provides a practical decision-making framework for governments to design targeted subsidy policies and for enterprises to formulate low-carbon competition strategies.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05188-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05188-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05188-x

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().