EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Valuing the Great Green Wall economic benefits with the Inclusive Wealth Index approach

Thierry Yerema Coulibaly and Shunsuke Managi ()
Additional contact information
Thierry Yerema Coulibaly: Kyushu University
Shunsuke Managi: Kyushu University

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: Abstract Eleven nations launched the Great Green Wall (GGW) initiative to restore 100 million hectares of degraded land in the Sahel by 2030 and combat worsening desertification. However, investment in the initiative has stagnated, and public funding may be necessary. A key barrier to mobilizing such support is the difficulty in comparing the economic benefits of investing in nature against the trade-offs it may pose for other sectors of the economy. This study applies the Inclusive Wealth Index (IWI) framework to assess the net economic value of the GGW. The IWI measures long-term national productivity by accounting for changes in human capital (HC), produced capital (PC), and natural capital (NC). We compare the growth of these assets and overall IWI between GGW and non-GGW countries. Findings show that in 2019, natural capital comprised 19% of Africa’s wealth, down from 31% in 1992. While NC declined in 16 of 40 African countries over this period, HC and PC expanded in all. Between 1990 and 2019, NC grew by 0.1% annually in GGW countries, compared to a −0.06% decline among non-GGW participants. Despite this, IWI growth in GGW countries was 1.3%, substantially lower than the 3.11% observed in other nations. Projections based on historical growth suggest NC could grow by 3.1% if GGW goals are fully met, or by 1.8% if only partially achieved, both significantly higher than business-as-usual trends elsewhere. However, increased investment in NC may reduce growth in HC, PC, and overall IWI for GGW countries. These results underscore that NC investments under the GGW may slow future economic growth unless external funding offsets opportunity costs. There is a need for external funding to balance ecological restoration with sustained economic development.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05221-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05221-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05221-z

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-03
Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05221-z