What principles ought to underpin ‘Radical Prevention Funds’? Ten principles capable of addressing social determinants to promote public health

Elliott Aidan Johnson, Simon Duffy, Graham Stark, Joanne Atkinson, Howard Reed, Daniel Nettle, Richard Wilkinson and Matthew Johnson ()
Additional contact information
Elliott Aidan Johnson: Northumbria University
Simon Duffy: Citizen Network
Graham Stark: Northumbria University
Joanne Atkinson: Northumbria University
Howard Reed: Northumbria University
Daniel Nettle: Northumbria University
Richard Wilkinson: Northumbria University
Matthew Johnson: Northumbria University

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: Abstract The UK Government has increasingly concluded that ‘prevention is better than cure’ on the basis that preventive health interventions are more cost-effective than reactive services in delivering additional years in good health for the population. However, UK health and care systems are under intense financial pressure that preclude their shifting resources upstream to address social determinants of health. A separate Radical Prevention Fund (RPF) that supports such upstream interventions by addressing social determinants has been developed by UK Mayoral Combined Authorities as part of a package of long-term reform. This article sets out 10 principles to shape the use of such funds that lack, at present, cogent interpretation and coherent design. In place of inequality promoting and health damaging Rawlsian approaches, we assert a consequentialist approach that upholds the lexical priority of an equality principle instrumentally before setting out a series of interpersonal, institutional and geographical foci that are critical to achieving better outcomes in public health. We draw on a growing body of evidence on means of addressing social determinants to suggest that this may well mean, for example, providing money directly to those who need it rather than a more politically palatable, but less effective, service that only partially mitigates negative effects of an issue over an extended period. In this way, we ensure that an RPF is necessarily radical and preventive.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05673-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05673-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05673-3

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().