To engage with AI or not: learning engagement among rural junior high school students in an AI-powered adaptive learning environment

Jining Han (), Geping Liu and Shu Xiang
Additional contact information
Jining Han: Southwest University
Geping Liu: Southwest University
Shu Xiang: Longquan No. 1 Primary School

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: Abstract The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of certain factors, as defined by self-determination theory, the technology acceptance model, and cognitive load theory, and their relationships on the learning engagement of rural junior high school students within an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered adaptive learning system (ALS). The main research question investigates how these factors not only interact to understand student engagement but also inform the implementation of AI in educational settings. A model is constructed that reflects these theories and is tested using a survey administered across five rural junior high schools by utilizing AI-powered ALS. Path analysis and mediation effect analysis are employed to assess the effects of various factors on student engagement. The results indicate that technological acceptance and perceived ability significantly enhance student learning engagement. In AI-powered ALS, extrinsic cognitive load is more important than intrinsic load. Perceived autonomy, perceived ability, and perceived relatedness are found to positively affect technological acceptance. The mediation effects reveal that technological acceptance partially mediates the relationship between perceived ability and engagement, fully mediates the relationship between perceived relatedness and engagement, and has no mediating effect on the relationship between perceived autonomy and engagement. The study concludes that to improve learning engagement, educational systems should focus on enhancing technology acceptance by improving system usability and learning outcomes. Furthermore, it recommends fostering student competence through effective monitoring and immediate feedback on errors and minimizing extraneous cognitive load through clearer instructions and feedback. These strategies could be pivotal in designing targeted instructional frameworks for AI-powered learning environments.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05676-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05676-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05676-0

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().