Stress and burnout among social workers – a relation mediated by coping styles

Anca Mihai (), Elen Silvana Crivoi (), Lucian Alecu (), Ovidiu Pop (), Daniela Nita (), Georgiana Cristina Rentea (), Adrian Luca () and Florin Lazar ()
Additional contact information
Anca Mihai: University of Bucharest
Elen Silvana Crivoi: University of Bucharest
Lucian Alecu: University of Bucharest
Ovidiu Pop: University of Bucharest
Daniela Nita: University of Bucharest
Georgiana Cristina Rentea: University of Bucharest
Adrian Luca: University of Bucharest
Florin Lazar: University of Bucharest

Palgrave Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Abstract As social workers experience higher levels of stress and burnout than comparable occupational groups, understanding what mediates their relationship could help develop adequate support services. Little is known about the mediating role of social workers’ coping strategies in the relationship between perceived stress and burnout, even more so in Romania, where the profession was reinstated after the fall of communism. We used measures of stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire), coping (Brief-COPE), and burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-CBI). Following previous research, in a convenience sample of registered social workers (n = 324), we first test if stress and burnout are statistically significant correlated and second if problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidant coping mediate the relationship between stress and personal and work-related burnout experienced by Romanian social workers. Results show that avoidant coping (standardized indirect effect 0.044) partially mediates the relation between stress and personal burnout and emotion-focused coping (standardized indirect effect 0.022) partially mediates the relation between stress and work-related burnout, both having a reduced mediation impact. However, problem-focused coping does not mediate the relationship between stress and burnout. There is a low positive and significant partial mediation of (a) self-blame coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.046) in the relation between perceived stress and personal burnout and (b) denial coping strategy (standardized indirect effect 0.022) in the relation between perceived stress and work-related burnout. When comparing perceived stress and burnout levels, a more frequent use of maladaptive coping strategies leads to higher levels of stress and burnout, while a more frequent use of adaptive strategies has no effect. Our data show the need for training and developing adequate mechanisms to help social workers regulate stress levels. Future studies should investigate the role external factors (e.g., organizational or structural) play in reducing burnout levels and assuring that social workers’ needs for a healthy working climate are met.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05780-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05780-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05780-1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().