Is the resettlement suitability of migrants in arid mountainous areas high or low? A case study of ecological migration in Gansu Province, China

Wei Zhang, Liang Zhou (), Yan Zhang and Chunliang Xiu
Additional contact information
Wei Zhang: Northeastern University
Liang Zhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University
Yan Zhang: Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Chunliang Xiu: Northeastern University

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Abstract Extreme climate, natural disasters, and deep poverty have triggered increasingly common migration worldwide. China’s resettlement projects have relocated approximately 10 million residents from disaster-prone, drought-prone, mountainous areas to suitable resettlement sites. However, ecological migration (EM) and short-period resettlement site selection may pose potential risks to the sustainable development of resettlement. Furthermore, previous research has focused on immigrants’ livelihoods but paid less attention to resettlement suitability (RS) in arid mountainous areas. This paper conducts a case study investigating the measurement, differences, and obstacles of RS for EM resettlement sites in northwest China’s mountainous regions. We select 29 indicators from five dimensions, including geology, climate, economy, transportation, and public services, to construct an assessment model of RS. The results show that resettlement site suitability is inversely related to altitude and directly related to economic vitality. RS along traffic arteries and near water systems is significantly higher than in other areas. Long-distance resettlement’s average suitability is 14.63% higher than short-distance resettlement, facilitating migration resettlement. Topographic and geological conditions are the primary factors hindering RS in arid mountainous areas, with an obstacle degree of 37.11%. Flat terrain, convenient water access, and medical treatment are crucial for RS. This research offers insights into EM decisions in arid mountainous areas and improving RS and regional sustainable development under global climate change.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05833-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05833-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05833-5

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().