EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Government as a disaster science communicator: does framing differ between routine and emergency periods in China?

Qihui Xie (), Binjie He and Junqi Wang
Additional contact information
Qihui Xie: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing)
Binjie He: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing)
Junqi Wang: China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing)

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Abstract Exploring the framing in the Chinese government's disaster science communication, as well as whether there are differences in framing between routine and emergency periods of a disaster, can help summarize the models of government-led science communication for disaster risk reduction. This study takes the content related to science communication on rainstorm disasters from the Chinese government’s 82 official Weibo accounts as the research object, and utilizes LDA topic modeling and sentiment lexicon matching to explore the three-tiered framing under both routine and emergency periods. The high-level framing explores the communication themes. Six themes were discovered, corresponding to three types of scientific knowledge: practical, theoretical, and conceptual. The mid-level framing examines the content preferences of the government in routine and emergency periods. It was found that the routine period focuses more on communicating theoretical and conceptual scientific knowledge, while the emergency period places more emphasis on the communication of practical scientific knowledge. The low-level framing explores the government’s emotional expression strategies in routine and emergency periods it was observed that in the routine period, encouraging and guiding expressions account for a higher proportion, while in the emergency period, conciliatory, mandatory, and emphasis expressions account for a higher proportion. These findings can serve as an effective complement to the scientific communication for disaster risk reduction efforts carried out by scientists.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-06028-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-06028-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-06028-8

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-11-19
Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-06028-8