‘We are the eyes and ears of the community’: reflections from social prescribing link workers during the real-world practice of a new community enhanced model

Cheyann Jade Heap (), Mike Croft, Clair Hughes, Alfre Linton, Sinead Mackin, Adam Rothwell, Julie Traverse, Maria Waters, Julie Ridley, Peter Coventry, Annette Bauer and Martin Webber ()
Additional contact information
Cheyann Jade Heap: University of York, School for Business and Society, Church Lane Building
Mike Croft: Coppice Library and Wellbeing Centre, BlueSCI Support
Clair Hughes: Coppice Library and Wellbeing Centre, BlueSCI Support
Alfre Linton: Coppice Library and Wellbeing Centre, BlueSCI Support
Sinead Mackin: Coppice Library and Wellbeing Centre, BlueSCI Support
Adam Rothwell: Coppice Library and Wellbeing Centre, BlueSCI Support
Julie Traverse: Coppice Library and Wellbeing Centre, BlueSCI Support
Maria Waters: Coppice Library and Wellbeing Centre, BlueSCI Support
Julie Ridley: University of Central Lancashire, Centre for Citizenship and Community, Eden Building
Peter Coventry: Manchester Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health and Education
Annette Bauer: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Martin Webber: University of York, School for Business and Society, Church Lane Building

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025, vol. 12, issue 1, 1-8

Abstract: Abstract Social prescribing, or connecting people to valued community assets, is a key component of the UK’s health system. However, social prescribing research has inconsistent aims and outcomes, and there is limited data on the views of social prescribing professionals (‘link workers’) themselves. As part of a new model of Community-Enhanced Social Prescribing, this paper presents a co-created reflective case study developed by social prescribing link workers and researchers. The paper describes how link workers engaged with training on research in social prescribing, and used this as a platform to reflect upon key issues about their role. Themes from the discussion, which were grouped inductively based on principles of thematic analysis, encompassed: link working as a vocation; the complexity of the link worker role; how social prescribing is not a panacea; valuing social approaches to health; link working as shaped by organisational culture; and link worker training needs. The implications for Community-Enhanced Social Prescribing and social prescribing as a profession are discussed.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-06035-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-06035-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-06035-9

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().