Independence of events and errors in understanding it

Chris Roney ()
Additional contact information
Chris Roney: King’s University College, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 2M3 Canada

Palgrave Communications, 2016, vol. 2, issue 1, 1-5

Abstract: Abstract This article outlines errors that may occur when people predict event outcomes. The focus is on how our tendency to perceive independent events as connected, consistent with tenets of Gestalt Psychology, biases our expectations. Two well-documented phenomena that occur when people make predictions after a run of a particular outcome—the “gambler’s fallacy” and the “hot hand”—are used to illustrate the issue and research is presented that highlights the importance of misperceptions of independence. Novel implications and hypotheses are presented that are generated from use of this gestalt approach.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palcomms.2016.50 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palcom:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_palcomms.2016.50

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/palcomms/about

DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.50

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Palgrave Communications from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().