A VaR assuming Student t distribution not significantly different from a VaR assuming normal distribution
Su Xu ()
Additional contact information
Su Xu: Anhui University of Science and Technology
Risk Management, 2017, vol. 19, issue 3, 189-201
Abstract In estimating VaR using the variance–covariance approach, the returns of a portfolio are commonly assumed to follow a Student t distribution rather than a normal distribution, given the Student distribution’s ability to capture more tail events. However, it is not clear to what measurable extent the Student t distribution is superior to the normal distribution in this exercise. This paper shows that the two assumptions do not produce significantly different VaR values when the degrees of freedom are greater than 4. This paper also determines a sigma threshold for the Student t distribution, which generally lies between 3 and 4 sigma’s when the degrees of freedom are greater than 4.
Keywords: VaR; Student t distribution; Normal distribution; Adjustment factor; Sigma threshold (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41283-017-0017-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:risman:v:19:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1057_s41283-017-0017-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Risk Management is currently edited by Igor Loncarski
More articles in Risk Management from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().