Differences in Risk Measurement for Small Unlisted Businesses

Edward A. Vos
Additional contact information
Edward A. Vos: University of Waikato

Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 1992, vol. 1, issue 3, 255-267

Abstract: The use of traditional risk measurement techniques for small unlisted businesses proves difficult due to a lack of market information. A sample of 209 small businesses in New Zealand was gathered to test the possibility of using accounting betas for risk measurement. While the accounting betas calculated for the listed companies in New Zealand did relate similarly to previous studies, several differences with the unlisted businesses are uncovered. The need to develop better measurement devices is highlighted if benchmarks for risk vs. return equilibrium are to be found for the class of small unlisted businesses.

Keywords: Risk; Risk Measurement; Small Business; Unlisted (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G32 L25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jefsite.org/RePEc/pep/journl/jef-1992-01-3-e-vos.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pep:journl:v:1:y:1992:i:3:p:255-267

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance from Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Craig Everett ().