SOURCES, OBSTACLES AND EFFECTS OF INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN THE LUBUSKIE REGION IN 2009-2011 – PROBIT MODELING
Arkadiusz Swiadek () and
Jadwiga Goraczkowska ()
Additional contact information
Arkadiusz Swiadek: University of Zielonagora
Jadwiga Goraczkowska: University of Zielonagora
Oeconomia Copernicana, 2013, vol. 4, issue 1, 79-99
Abstract:
The aim of the study was to determine the significance of the use of probit modeling and the impact of sources and barriers to innovation activity and to determine its effects, in particular investments in innovation and implementation of new solutions. The main hypothesis of this paper is the claim that the innovative activity of enterprises is dependent on the diversity of factors affecting the parties, and both the source and the barriers can be influenced in different directions. The collected material for research (545 surveys) were analyzed by means of probability. The reason for the choice of this method is the fact that in the case of dichotomous variables (ie, taking the value of 0-no, 1-yes) the use of multiple regression is pointless. The values of this function may in fact be negative, which deprives them of interpretive meaning. An alternative test method in this situation is the probit regression. Positively to the implementation of new solutions affects search for information on innovations in science. The transfer of knowledge and the creation of new technological solutions, in particular, contribute to interna-tional research bodies. This strong links with R&D in the future may result in the achievement of superiority in the region. Interestingly it appears that keeping a positive effect on innovation activity affects their high cost. It’s not disstimulating on companies to implement such new products and processes. It can therefore draw the thesis that high expenditures on innovative activities of entrepreneurs make thorough preparation for innovation processes in their companies in order to minimize the risk of failure of implementing the new solution. In this way, many of them are successful. In addition, this thesis confirms the correctness of the fact that more than half of the surveyed companies indicated the cost barrier, and so much of the reasoning confirms the research sample.
Keywords: innovation; region; system; determinants of innovation; effects of innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L60 O31 O32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2013.006 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:4:y:2013:i:1:p:79-99
Access Statistics for this article
Oeconomia Copernicana is currently edited by Adam P. Balcerzak and Michal Moszynski
More articles in Oeconomia Copernicana from Institute of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Adam P. Balcerzak ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).