Accounting – Profession vs. Science

Zsuzsanna Ilona Kovács and István Deák

Public Finance Quarterly, 2012, vol. 57, issue 4, 426-436

Abstract: Defining accounting as a scientific field has been a matter of controversy. This paper is intended to describe the scientific grounds of accounting by way of analysing the International Financial Reporting Standards system. We compare T. S. Kuhn’s theory of scientific philosophy with the regulations and evolution of the selected reporting system. We conclude that the elements of the disciplinary matrix of accounting are prescribed by the Framework and by the specific problem-solving methods associated with the standards. Over the last few decades, the economy has been subject to fundamental changes that have tested the resilience of any accounting system. These challenges to the paradigm have launched a series of shifts in the field of international accounting, which correspond to the steps of scientific revolutions described by Kuhn. At present, standard setters are focused on renewing the reporting paradigm and formulating globally relevant standards.

Keywords: international financial reporting; disciplinary matrix; scientific revolutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A12 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/8970/ (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pfq:journl:v:57:y:2012:i:4:p:426-436

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Finance Quarterly from Corvinus University of Budapest Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Adam Hoffmann ().