Why has the Philippines remained a poor country?: some perspectives from growth economics

Michael M. Alba
Additional contact information
Michael M. Alba: De La Salle University, Manila

Philippine Review of Economics, 2007, vol. 44, issue 2, 1-31

Abstract: Why has the living standard of the Philippines relative to that of the United States not risen unlike its Asian neighbors? Applying a simple neoclassical model and some empirical methods of analysis employed in growth economics on data on national income accounts and the workforce from the Penn World Table (version 6.1) and years of schooling from Barro and Lee [2000], this paper submits three interconnected answers: The country has been stuck in a low-growth trajectory. It is headed for a low steady-state level of output per worker, which explains its slow pace of long-term growth. Most significantly, its total-factor productivity, at 20.9 percent of that of the United States, is horrendously low, which explains its low convergence point. Improving its total-factor productivity is thus the key to solving the country’s low living standard.

Keywords: economic growth; total factor productivity; convergence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O43 O47 O53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://pre.econ.upd.edu.ph/index.php/pre/article/view/226/620 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:phs:prejrn:v:44:y:2007:i:2:p:1-31

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Philippine Review of Economics from University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HR Rabe ().