Growth and Structural Change in Pakistan's

Stephen Jr. and Ronald SouGO

The Pakistan Development Review, 1965, vol. 5, issue 4, 663-665

Abstract: Gustav Papanek's comments on changes in relative prices among manufactured goods are, indeed, important. As he notes, however, the correction to constant prices would not change the measure of the importance of import substitution in explaining the growth of any given industrial groupl. Also, for the period 1954/55 to 1963/64, the contribution of import substitution to total growth in value added in consumer goods industries is only slightly greater than the contribution of import substitution to growth in value added in all industries (21.0 per cent for consumer goods as opposed to 19.4 per cent for all industries).

Date: 1965
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1965/Volume4/663-665.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pid:journl:v:5:y:1965:i:4:p:663-665

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Pakistan Development Review from Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Khurram Iqbal ().