EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation

Jonathan Kimmelman, Jeffrey S Mogil and Ulrich Dirnagl

PLOS Biology, 2014, vol. 12, issue 5, 1-4

Abstract: : Kimmelman and colleagues argue that the key to improving preclinical research lies in distinguishing between two different modes of research: exploratory vs. confirmatory. Preclinical researchers confront two overarching agendas related to drug development: selecting interventions amid a vast field of candidates, and producing rigorous evidence of clinical promise for a small number of interventions. We suggest that each challenge is best met by two different, complementary modes of investigation. In the first (exploratory investigation), researchers should aim at generating robust pathophysiological theories of disease. In the second (confirmatory investigation), researchers should aim at demonstrating strong and reproducible treatment effects in relevant animal models. Each mode entails different study designs, confronts different validity threats, and supports different kinds of inferences. Research policies should seek to disentangle the two modes and leverage their complementarity. In particular, policies should discourage the common use of exploratory studies to support confirmatory inferences, promote a greater volume of confirmatory investigation, and customize design and reporting guidelines for each mode.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001863 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file ... 01863&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001863

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001863

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosbiology ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001863