Optimising risk-based surveillance for early detection of invasive plant pathogens

Alexander J Mastin, Timothy R Gottwald, Frank van den Bosch, Nik J Cunniffe and Stephen Parnell

PLOS Biology, 2020, vol. 18, issue 10, 1-25

Abstract: Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) of plants continue to devastate ecosystems and livelihoods worldwide. Effective management requires surveillance to detect epidemics at an early stage. However, despite the increasing use of risk-based surveillance programs in plant health, it remains unclear how best to target surveillance resources to achieve this. We combine a spatially explicit model of pathogen entry and spread with a statistical model of detection and use a stochastic optimisation routine to identify which arrangement of surveillance sites maximises the probability of detecting an invading epidemic. Our approach reveals that it is not always optimal to target the highest-risk sites and that the optimal strategy differs depending on not only patterns of pathogen entry and spread but also the choice of detection method. That is, we find that spatial correlation in risk can make it suboptimal to focus solely on the highest-risk sites, meaning that it is best to avoid ‘putting all your eggs in one basket’. However, this depends on an interplay with other factors, such as the sensitivity of available detection methods. Using the economically important arboreal disease huanglongbing (HLB), we demonstrate how our approach leads to a significant performance gain and cost saving in comparison with conventional methods to targeted surveillance.Emerging infectious diseases of plants continue to devastate ecosystems and livelihoods worldwide. By linking a mathematical model of pest spread with a computational optimisation routine, this study identifies where to look for invasive pests if we wish to detect them at an early stage; this method improves upon conventional methods of risk-based surveillance and is robust to model misspecification.

Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000863 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file ... 00863&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000863

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000863

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosbiology ().