On improving the sustainability of peer review

Daniel Routledge, Nonia Pariente and On Behalf of the PLOS Biology Staff Editors

PLOS Biology, 2025, vol. 23, issue 3, 1-3

Abstract: The term “reviewer fatigue” has become only too familiar in scientific publishing. How can we ease the burden on reviewers to make the peer review system more sustainable, while streamlining the publication process for authors?The term “reviewer fatigue” has become only too familiar in scientific publishing. This editorial discusses how we can ease the burden on reviewers to make the peer review system more sustainable, while streamlining the publication process for authors.

Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003127 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file ... 03127&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003127

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003127

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosbiology ().