eDNA surveys substantially expand known geographic and ecological niche boundaries of marine fishes

Loïc Sanchez, Nicolas Loiseau, Camille Albouy, Morgane Bruno, Adèle Barroil, Alicia Dalongeville, Julie Deter, Jean-Dominique Durand, Nadia Faure, Fabian Fopp, Régis Hocdé, Mélissa Jaquier, Narriman S Jiddawi, Meret Jucker, Jean-Baptiste Juhel, Kadarusman, Virginie Marques, Laëtitia Mathon, David Mouillot, Marie Orblin, Loïc Pellissier, Raphaël Seguin, Hagi Yulia Sugeha, Alice Valentini, Laure Velez, Indra Bayu Vimono, Fabien Leprieur and Stéphanie Manel

PLOS Biology, 2025, vol. 23, issue 10, 1-22

Abstract: Assessing species geographic distributions is critical to approximate their ecological niches, understand how global change may reshape their occurrence patterns, and predict their extinction risks. Yet, species records are over-aggregated across taxonomic, geographic, environmental, and anthropogenic dimensions. The under-sampling of remote locations biases the quantification of species geographic distributions and ecological niche for most species. Here, we used nearly one thousand environmental DNA (eDNA) samples across the world’s oceans, including polar regions and tropical remote islands, to determine the extent to which the geographic and ecological niche ranges of marine fishes are underestimated through the lens of global occurrence records based on conventional surveys. Our eDNA surveys revealed that the known geographic ranges for 93% of species and the ecological niche ranges for 7% of species were underestimated, and contributed to filling them. We show that the probability to detect a range filling for a given species is primarily shaped by the GBIF/OBIS sampling effort in a cell, but also by the number of occurrences available for the species. Most gap fillings were achieved by addressing a methodological sampling bias, notably when eDNA facilitated the detection of small fishes in previously sampled locations using conventional methods. Using a machine learning model, we found that a local effort of 10 eDNA samples would detect 24 additional fish species on average and a maximum of 98 species in previously unsampled tropical areas. Yet, a null model revealed that only half of ecological niche range fillings would be due to eDNA surveys, beyond a random allocation of classical sampling effort. Altogether, our results suggest that sampling in remote areas and performing eDNA surveys in over-sampled areas may both increase fish ecological niche ranges toward unexpected values with consequences in biodiversity modeling, management, and conservation.Global species records often underestimate marine fish distributions due to sampling biases, especially in remote regions. This study shows that environmental DNA surveys significantly expand known geographic and ecological niche ranges, revealing hidden biodiversity and improving predictions for conservation and ecological modeling.

Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003432 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file ... 03432&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003432

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003432

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosbiology ().