Is scientific reform an unwinnable arms race?

Marcus R Munafò and George Davey Smith

PLOS Biology, 2026, vol. 24, issue 2, 1-3

Abstract: Improvements to scientific methods and approaches should, in theory, mean more robust evidence and inference, and more rapid advances in knowledge. In practice, they have led to an increasing number of poor-quality studies. Can we break this cycle?Methodological improvements should, in theory, mean more robust evidence and inference, and more rapid advances in knowledge. However, these methods are often subsequently used in the pursuit of publication for the sake of publication, rather than in the pursuit of knowledge. Can we break this cycle?

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003660 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file ... 03660&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003660

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003660

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosbiology ().