An automated approach to the quantitation of vocalizations and vocal learning in the songbird

David G Mets and Michael S Brainard

PLOS Computational Biology, 2018, vol. 14, issue 8, 1-29

Abstract: Studies of learning mechanisms critically depend on the ability to accurately assess learning outcomes. This assessment can be impeded by the often complex, multidimensional nature of behavior. We present a novel, automated approach to evaluating imitative learning. Conceptually, our approach estimates how much of the content present in a reference behavior is absent from the learned behavior. We validate our approach through examination of songbird vocalizations, complex learned behaviors the study of which has provided many insights into sensory-motor learning in general and vocal learning in particular. Historically, learning has been holistically assessed by human inspection or through comparison of specific song features selected by experimenters (e.g. fundamental frequency, spectral entropy). In contrast, our approach uses statistical models to broadly capture the structure of each song, and then estimates the divergence between the two models. We show that our measure of song learning (the Kullback-Leibler divergence between two distributions corresponding to specific song data, or, Song DKL) is well correlated with human evaluation of song learning. We then expand the analysis beyond learning and show that Song DKL also detects the typical song deterioration that occurs following deafening. Finally, we illustrate how this measure can be extended to quantify differences in other complex behaviors such as human speech and handwriting. This approach potentially provides a framework for assessing learning across a broad range of behaviors like song that can be described as a set of discrete and repeated motor actions.Author summary: Measuring learning outcomes is a critical objective of research into the mechanisms that support learning. Demonstration that a given manipulation results in better or worse learning outcomes requires an accurate and consistent measurement of learning quality. However, many behaviors (e.g. speaking, walking, and writing) are complex and multidimensional, confounding the assessment of learning. One behavior subject to such confounds, vocal learning in Estrildid finches, has emerged as a vital model for sensory motor learning broadly and human speech learning in particular. Here, we demonstrate a new approach to the assessment of learning for complex high dimensional behaviors. Conceptually, we estimate the amount of content present in a reference behavior that is absent in the resultant learned behavior. We show that this measure provides a holistic and automated assessment of vocal learning in Estrildid finches that is consistent with human assessment. We then illustrate how this measure can be used to quantify changes in other complex behaviors such as human speech. We conclude that this approach could be useful in assessing shared content in other similarly structured behaviors composed of a set of discrete and repeated motor actions.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006437 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/fil ... 06437&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006437

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006437

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Computational Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ploscompbiol ().