Predicting kinase inhibitors using bioactivity matrix derived informer sets

Huikun Zhang, Spencer S Ericksen, Ching-pei Lee, Gene E Ananiev, Nathan Wlodarchak, Peng Yu, Julie C Mitchell, Anthony Gitter, Stephen J Wright, F Michael Hoffmann, Scott A Wildman and Michael A Newton

PLOS Computational Biology, 2019, vol. 15, issue 8, 1-29

Abstract: Prediction of compounds that are active against a desired biological target is a common step in drug discovery efforts. Virtual screening methods seek some active-enriched fraction of a library for experimental testing. Where data are too scarce to train supervised learning models for compound prioritization, initial screening must provide the necessary data. Commonly, such an initial library is selected on the basis of chemical diversity by some pseudo-random process (for example, the first few plates of a larger library) or by selecting an entire smaller library. These approaches may not produce a sufficient number or diversity of actives. An alternative approach is to select an informer set of screening compounds on the basis of chemogenomic information from previous testing of compounds against a large number of targets. We compare different ways of using chemogenomic data to choose a small informer set of compounds based on previously measured bioactivity data. We develop this Informer-Based-Ranking (IBR) approach using the Published Kinase Inhibitor Sets (PKIS) as the chemogenomic data to select the informer sets. We test the informer compounds on a target that is not part of the chemogenomic data, then predict the activity of the remaining compounds based on the experimental informer data and the chemogenomic data. Through new chemical screening experiments, we demonstrate the utility of IBR strategies in a prospective test on three kinase targets not included in the PKIS.Author summary: In the early stages of drug discovery efforts, computational models are used to predict activity and prioritize compounds for experimental testing. New targets commonly lack the data necessary to build effective models, and the screening needed to generate that experimental data can be costly. We seek to improve the efficiency of the initial screening phase, and of the process of prioritizing compounds for subsequent screening.

Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006813 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/fil ... 06813&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006813

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006813

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Computational Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ploscompbiol ().