Estimating genetic variance contributed by a quantitative trait locus: A random model approach

Shibo Wang, Fangjie Xie and Shizhong Xu

PLOS Computational Biology, 2022, vol. 18, issue 3, 1-30

Abstract: Detecting quantitative trait loci (QTL) and estimating QTL variances (represented by the squared QTL effects) are two main goals of QTL mapping and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, there are issues associated with estimated QTL variances and such issues have not attracted much attention from the QTL mapping community. Estimated QTL variances are usually biased upwards due to estimation being associated with significance tests. The phenomenon is called the Beavis effect. However, estimated variances of QTL without significance tests can also be biased upwards, which cannot be explained by the Beavis effect; rather, this bias is due to the fact that QTL variances are often estimated as the squares of the estimated QTL effects. The parameters are the QTL effects and the estimated QTL variances are obtained by squaring the estimated QTL effects. This square transformation failed to incorporate the errors of estimated QTL effects into the transformation. The consequence is biases in estimated QTL variances. To correct the biases, we can either reformulate the QTL model by treating the QTL effect as random and directly estimate the QTL variance (as a variance component) or adjust the bias by taking into account the error of the estimated QTL effect. A moment method of estimation has been proposed to correct the bias. The method has been validated via Monte Carlo simulation studies. The method has been applied to QTL mapping for the 10-week-body-weight trait from an F2 mouse population.Author summary: One of the goals of QTL mapping and GWAS is to quantify the size of a QTL, which is measured by the QTL variance or the proportion of trait variance explained by the QTL. The effect of a QTL appears in a linear or linear mixed model as a regression coefficient and defined as a fixed effect. The estimated QTL variance in conventional QTL mapping studies takes the square of the estimated QTL effect. This is a biased estimate of QTL variance. An unbiased estimate of the QTL variance should be obtained by (1) treating the QTL effect as random and estimating the variance of the random effect or (2) adjusting the squared estimated QTL effect by the squared estimation error. We proved that the two methods are identical. We further proved that the usual R2 (goodness of fit) in regression analysis is equivalent to the biased QTL heritability while the adjusted R2 is equivalent to the bias corrected QTL heritability.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009923 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/fil ... 09923&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009923

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009923

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Computational Biology from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ploscompbiol ().