EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does mHealth influence community health worker performance in vulnerable populations? A mixed methods study in a multinational refugee settlement in Uganda

Michael T Wagaba, David Musoke, Arthur Bagonza, John B Ddamulira, Christine K Nalwadda and Christopher G Orach

PLOS Global Public Health, 2023, vol. 3, issue 12, 1-18

Abstract: Community Health Workers (CHWs) provide healthcare in under-served communities, including refugee settlements, despite various challenges hindering their performance. Implementers have adopted mobile wireless technologies (m-Health) to improve the performance of CHWs in refugee settlements. We assessed the CHWs’ performance and associated factors in a multi-national refugee settlement, operating mHealth and paper-based methods. This cross-sectional study employed quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Data for 300 CHWs was collected from implementing partners’ (IPs) databases. Nine focus group discussions (FGDs) with the CHWs and community members, two in-depth interviews (IDIs) with CHW leaders, and eight key informant interviews (KIIs) with six IPs and two local leaders were conducted. The qualitative data were analysed thematically using AtlasTi version 9 while the quantitative data were analysed at the univariate, bivariate and multivariable levels using Stata version14. The study found that only 17% of the CHWs performed optimally. The factors that significantly influenced CHW performance included education level: secondary and above (APR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.02–3.30), having a side occupation (APR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.16–3.52) and mHealth use (APR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02-.0.30). The qualitative data suggested that performance was influenced by the number of households assigned to CHWs, monetary incentives, adequacy of materials and facilitation. Particularly, mHealth was preferred to paper-based methods. Overall, the CHWs’ performance was sub-optimal; only 2 in 10 performed satisfactorily. The main factors that influenced performance included the level of education, use of mHealth, having another occupation, workload and incentivisation. CHWs and IPs preferred mHealth to paper-based methods. IPs should work to improve refugee settlement working conditions for the CHWs and adopt mHealth to improve CHW performance.

Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... journal.pgph.0002741 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... 02741&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002741

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002741

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Global Public Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by globalpubhealth ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-04
Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002741