Tools and methods for cataract recognition in low-resource settings: A narrative review

Paulina N Truong, Elizabeth A Merlinsky, Nicholas C Maamari, Christina Y Weng and Andrew G Lee

PLOS Global Public Health, 2025, vol. 5, issue 5, 1-11

Abstract: Cataracts are a leading cause of global blindness, with many low-resource populations having poor access to eye care. While much is known regarding surgical access and outcomes, less is understood about the initial detection of operable cataracts in low-resource settings. We performed a comprehensive literature review on existing and emerging cataract screening methods in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The search keywords were “cataract detection, diagnosis, assessment, and evaluation in low- and middle- income countries”. 1,825 articles were identified and 62 were selected for final inclusion comprising reviews, meta-analyses, and original research studies. Only 12 studies proposed new cataract screening methods for low-income settings. We extracted data on the efficacy and cost-efficiency of these novel methods and compared them to existing conventional cataract diagnosis methods. 8 out of 12 original research works developed novel devices or imaging modalities such as low-cost ophthalmoscopes and retinal cameras for cataract detection. 7 studies leveraged non-ophthalmologist staff to test their methods, suggesting a potential benefit of employing additional personnel for cataract screening. 8 studies utilized tele-ophthalmology and artificial intelligence (AI) platforms with high cataract detection accuracy. Overall, rates of cataract diagnosis in LMICs can be increased through a multifaceted strategy involving low-cost, portable devices operated by local healthcare workers and augmented by telehealth or AI approaches. Such efforts can aid in addressing the disparity between cataract diagnosis and surgical intervention in low-resource environments. However, improvements in research infrastructure are needed to support such efforts and the ability to thoroughly evaluate new innovations.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... journal.pgph.0004619 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... 04619&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004619

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004619

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Global Public Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by globalpubhealth ().