Evaluating the perceived outcome and impact of an integrated knowledge translation approach in the development of an equity reporting guideline: A cross-sectional survey

Jessica Brown, Omar Dewidar, Catherine Chamberlain, Luis Gabriel Cuervo, Holly North Ellingwood, Sonya Faber, Cindy Feng, Damian K Francis, Sarah Funnell, Elizabeth Ghogomu, Billie-Jo Hardy, Tanya Horsley, Mwenya Kasonde, Michelle Kennedy, Tamara Kredo, Julian Little, Michael Johnson Mahande, Zack Marshall, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Miriam Nkangu, Ekwaro A Obuku, Oyekola Oloyede, Ebenezer Owusu-Addo, Tomás Pantoja, Kevin Pottie, Anita Rizvi, Larissa Shamseer, Beverley Shea, Janice Tufte, Peter Tugwell, Zulfiqar Bhutta, Charles S Wiysonge, Luke Wolfenden, Janet Jull and Vivian Welch

PLOS Global Public Health, 2026, vol. 6, issue 1, 1-14

Abstract: Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) involves active engagement of knowledge users in co-producing research, ensuring their perspectives shape study design, analysis, and reporting. This can strengthen justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) considerations. We adopted an IKT approach in developing STROBE-Equity, an equity-focused reporting guidelin extension. The perceived value of embedding JEDI principles in reporting guideline development is unknown. This study examines the team’s perceptions on the implementation of the JEDI-enhanced IKT process and its influence on the guideline. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of STROBE-Equity project members (n = 68) between July–August 2024. The 19-item survey assessed disciplinary background, participation, and perceived benefits, challenges, and potential impacts of the JEDI-enhanced IKT approach. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes, which were quantified with frequencies and percentages. Thirty-one members responded. Most were aged 35–54 (61%), female (55%), based in Canada (35%), and trained in epidemiology (61%). Reported benefits of IKT included integrating diverse perspectives, inclusive representation, and collaborative learning. Challenges involved accessibility and accommodations, consensus-building, and navigating power dynamics between researchers, policymakers, and those with lived experience. Participants perceived that IKT broadened the understanding of social conditions in the development process and facilitated incorporation of end-user perspectives, which they believed would strengthen the credibility and applicability of the guideline. They also noted that this collaborative approach would likely enhance the dissemination and uptake of STROBE-Equity and enhance its acceptability moving forward. A JEDI-enhanced IKT approach was viewed as beneficial to the development of the reporting guideline. Challenges such as accessibility and balancing power dynamics highlight areas where the participatory process could be improved. Future research should continue to refine and evaluate inclusive approaches to guideline development to further advance JEDI in research.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... journal.pgph.0005854 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... 05854&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005854

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005854

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Global Public Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by globalpubhealth ().