Traditional bone setter practices and the interaction with biomedical care in the treatment of hip fractures in The Gambia: A qualitative study

Awa Touray, Kimberly Lakin, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Omar Cessay, Lucy Gates, Jainaba Badjie, Tida Saidy, Kaddy Darboe, Matthew L Costa, Celia L Gregson, Kate A Ward, Kebba Marenah and Sarah Drew

PLOS Global Public Health, 2026, vol. 6, issue 7, 1-24

Abstract: A growing ageing population in Africa underscores the need to reorient health systems to provide care for non-communicable conditions impacting older populations such as hip fractures. In The Gambia, the number of hip fractures are expected to quadruple for both men and women in the next 30 years. This is comparable to hip fracture incidence rates in other South and West African countries. Moreover, mortality rates post-hip fracture are 2–3 fold higher in populations from the African Region than for those in other high-income countries. Globally, in many countries including in The Gambia, musculoskeletal conditions are treated in a pluralistic medical system by both biomedical healthcare professionals and traditional bone setters (TBS). Further research is required to understand the interactions between these different therapeutic modalities in the treatment of fractures, including hip fractures – a life changing injury. Such evidence is important for developing collaborative initiatives between traditional and biomedical practitioners. This study sought to describe the practices and procedures used by TBS to treat hip fractures and their interactions between with biomedical care in The Gambia. In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 TBS and 38 healthcare professionals involved in hip fracture care provision in both rural and urban regions of the country. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis. TBS used different modalities to identify a hip fracture. Most TBS misidentified and treated hip fractures as dislocations. On account of this, treatment consisted of pulling, massaging, and kneading the limb back into the hip socket. During this process, TBS applied concoctions of herbs and butters followed by splinting and tying the limb. Few TBS provided pain relief medication during treatment and most advised an extensive period of immobilisation of the limb. Follow up visits reviewed recovery. The narratives of both TBS and healthcare professionals further highlighted the informal referral of hip fracture patients from TBS to biomedical care to receive radiographs, analgesia, and for other ailments. While some biomedical healthcare professionals maintained that TBS should have no role in hip fracture care, others noted the importance of regulation of TBS practices and training initiatives. Considering these findings, we propose short-, medium- and long-term recommendations for the integration of traditional and biomedical sectors in the treatment of hip fractures in The Gambia. This includes the need to establish regulatory mechanisms for TBS practices and patient referral pathways between biomedical and TBS care.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... journal.pgph.0006582 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/artic ... 06582&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006582

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006582

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Global Public Health from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by globalpubhealth ().