The Case against a Smoker's License
Jeff Collin
PLOS Medicine, 2012, vol. 9, issue 11, 1-2
Abstract:
In one half of a PLOS Medicine Debate, Jeff Collin argues against Simon Chapman's proposal for a smoker's license, saying that it is strategically flawed and ethically unsound. Background to the debate : Tobacco continues to kill millions of people around the world each year and its use is increasing in some countries, which makes the need for new, creative, and radical efforts to achieve the tobacco control endgame vitally important. One such effort is discussed in this PLOS Medicine Debate, where Simon Chapman presents his proposal for a “smoker's license” and Jeff Collin argues against. Chapman sets out a case for introducing a smart card license for smokers designed to limit access to tobacco products and encourage cessation. Key elements of the smoker's license include smokers setting daily limits, financial incentives for permanent license surrender, and a test of health risk knowledge for commencing smokers. Collin argues against the proposal, saying that it would shift focus away from the real vector of the epidemic—the tobacco industry—and that by focusing on individuals it would censure victims, increase stigmatization of smokers, and marginalize the poor.
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001343 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/fil ... 01343&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001343
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001343
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS Medicine from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosmedicine (plosmedicine@plos.org).