In vitro susceptibility of Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units (DTUs) to benznidazole: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrea Vela, Marco Coral-Almeida, Denis Sereno, Jaime A Costales, Christian Barnabé and Simone Frédérique Brenière

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2021, vol. 15, issue 3, 1-16

Abstract: Background: Chagas disease, a neglected tropical disease endemic to Latin America caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, currently affects 6–7 million people and is responsible for 12,500 deaths each year. No vaccine exists at present and the only two drugs currently approved for the treatment (benznidazole and nifurtimox), possess serious limitations, including long treatment regimes, undesirable side effects, and frequent clinical failures. A link between parasite genetic variability and drug sensibility/efficacy has been suggested, but remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated associations between T. cruzi genetic variability and in vitro benznidazole susceptibility via a systematic article review and meta-analysis. Methodology/Principal findings: In vitro normalized benznidazole susceptibility indices (LC50 and IC50) for epimastigote, trypomastigote and amastigote stages of different T. cruzi strains were recorded from articles in the scientific literature. A total of 60 articles, which include 189 assays, met the selection criteria for the meta-analysis. Mean values for each discrete typing unit (DTU) were estimated using the meta and metaphor packages through R software, and presented in a rainforest plot. Subsequently, a meta-regression analysis was performed to determine differences between estimated mean values by DTU/parasite stage/drug incubation times. For each parasite stage, some DTU mean values were significantly different, e.g. at 24h of drug incubation, a lower sensitivity to benznidazole of TcI vs. TcII trypomastigotes was noteworthy. Nevertheless, funnel plots detected high heterogeneity of the data within each DTU and even for a single strain. Conclusions/Significance: Several limitations of the study prevent assigning DTUs to different in vitro benznidazole sensitivity groups; however, ignoring the parasite’s genetic variability during drug development and evaluation would not be advisable. Our findings highlight the need for establishment of uniform experimental conditions as well as a screening of different DTUs during the optimization of new drug candidates for Chagas disease treatment. Author summary: Although a century has elapsed since Chagas disease discovery, only two drugs, benznidazole and nifurtimox, are approved for its treatment. These drugs have significant safety and efficacy limitations and their specific modes of action are still poorly understood. Moreover, the causative agent, the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, displays high genetic variability, which is suspected to affect clinical manifestations and disease outcome. With these facts in mind, we aimed to elucidate the role of the parasite’s genetic background in benznidazole treatment efficacy. Our results unveiled interesting differences in the sensitivity to benznidazole between some T. cruzi genotypes, which suggests genetic variability could influence patient cure rates. Additionally, they show the need for uniformity in experimental conditions during laboratory analysis of new drug candidates for Chagas disease treatment, and they highlight the importance of screening diverse T. cruzi strains from different genetic background as part of the process of drug evaluation and optimization.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009269 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id ... 09269&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009269

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009269

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosntds ().