 Associations of water contact frequency, duration, and activities with schistosome infection risk: A systematic review and meta-analysisFabian Reitzug, Julia Ledien and Goylette F Chami PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2023, vol. 17, issue 6, 1-28 Abstract: Background: Schistosomiasis is a water-borne parasitic disease which affects over 230 million people globally. The relationship between contact with open freshwater bodies and the likelihood of schistosome infection remains poorly quantified despite its importance for understanding transmission and parametrising transmission models. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to estimate the average effect of water contact duration, frequency, and activities on schistosome infection likelihood. We searched Embase, MEDLINE (including PubMed), Global Health, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until May 13, 2022. Observational and interventional studies reporting odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), or sufficient information to reconstruct effect sizes on individual-level associations between water contact and infection with any Schistosoma species were eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was used to calculate pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We screened 1,411 studies and included 101 studies which represented 192,691 participants across Africa, Asia, and South America. Included studies mostly reported on water contact activities (69%; 70/101) and having any water contact (33%; 33/101). Ninety-six percent of studies (97/101) used surveys to measure exposure. A meta-analysis of 33 studies showed that individuals with water contact were 3.14 times more likely to be infected (OR 3.14; 95% CI: 2.08–4.75) when compared to individuals with no water contact. Subgroup analyses showed that the positive association of water contact with infection was significantly weaker in children compared to studies which included adults and children (OR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.04–2.69 vs. OR 4.24; 95% CI: 2.59–6.97). An association of water contact with infection was only found in communities with ≥10% schistosome prevalence. Overall heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 93%) and remained high across all subgroups, except in direct observation studies (I2 range = 44%–98%). We did not find that occupational water contact such as fishing and agriculture (OR 2.57; 95% CI: 1.89–3.51) conferred a significantly higher risk of schistosome infection compared to recreational water contact (OR 2.13; 95% CI: 1.75–2.60) or domestic water contact (OR 1.91; 95% CI: 1.47–2.48). Higher duration or frequency of water contact did not significantly modify infection likelihood. Study quality across analyses was largely moderate or poor. Conclusions: Any current water contact was robustly associated with schistosome infection status, and this relationship held across adults and children, and schistosomiasis-endemic areas with prevalence greater than 10%. Substantial gaps remain in published studies for understanding interactions of water contact with age and gender, and the influence of these interactions for infection likelihood. As such, more empirical studies are needed to accurately parametrise exposure in transmission models. Our results imply the need for population-wide treatment and prevention strategies in endemic settings as exposure within these communities was not confined to currently prioritised high-risk groups such as fishing populations. Author summary: Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease endemic to 78 countries and affects over 230 million people globally, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa. Contact with open freshwater sources such as lakes, rivers, and dams puts people at risk of infection. Existing systematic reviews have linked schistosome infection to risk factors such as gender and a lack of access to clean drinking water and hygiene infrastructure. Yet, while these risk factors may be mediated by water contact behaviours, the direct association of water contact with schistosome infection likelihood remains poorly quantified. We conducted a systematic review of associations between water contact frequency, duration, and activities on schistosome infection likelihood. We found that having any water contact was associated with 3.14 times higher likelihood of infection compared to having no water contact. This relationship held across adults and children and across medium and high-prevalence settings. Out of 11 water contact activities, 10 actives were associated with increased infection risk. Occupational, domestic, and recreational exposure was associated with similar infection likelihood. The evidence on exposure-schistosome infection associations included in this meta-analysis comes largely from self-reported measures elicited through cross-sectional surveys. Over 90% of included studies did not mention measurement of water contact as one of their aims, meaning exposure measurement was not their primary focus. Study quality was mostly moderate or low and recall periods employed in studies varied between one day and one year. There is a need for an expert consensus to consistently measure exposure. Studies should report on the measurement periods and definitions of water contact categories that were used. Few studies reported on correlations of water contact with infection intensity; this information is needed from future studies to better understand transmission. Date: 2023 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011377 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011377 Access Statistics for this article More articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases from Public Library of Science |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.