The cost of sleeping sickness vector control in Yasa Bonga, a health district in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Rian Snijders,
Alexandra P M Shaw,
Richard Selby,
Inaki Tirados,
Paul R Bessell,
Alain Fukinsia,
Erick Miaka,
Fabrizio Tediosi,
Epco Hasker and
Marina Antillon
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2024, vol. 18, issue 11, 1-17
Abstract:
Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a neglected tropical disease caused by a parasite transmitted by tsetse flies, once inflicted over 30,000 annual cases and resulted in an estimated half a million deaths in the late twentieth century. An international gHAT control program has reduced cases to under 1,000 annually, encouraging the World Health Organization to target the elimination of gHAT transmission by 2030. This requires adopting innovative disease control approaches in foci where transmission persists. Since the last decade, case detection and treatment, the mainstay of controlling the disease, is supplemented by vector control using Tiny Targets, small insecticide-treated screens, which attract and kill tsetse. The advantages of Tiny Targets lie in their relatively low cost, easy deployment, and effectiveness. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), bearing 65% of the 799 gHAT cases reported globally in 2022, introduced Tiny Targets in 2015. This study estimates the annual cost of vector control using Tiny Targets in the health district of Yasa Bonga in the DRC and identifies the main cost drivers. Economic and financial costs, collected from the provider’s perspective, were used to estimate the average cost of tsetse control expressed as cost (i) per target used, (ii) per target deployed, (iii) per linear kilometre of river controlled, and (iv) per square kilometre protected by vector control. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on key parameters for results robustness.The estimated annual economic cost for protecting an area of 1,925 km2 was 120,000 USD. This translates to 5.30 USD per target used each year, 11 USD per target deployed in the field, 573 USD per linear km treated, and 62 USD per km2 protected. These costs in the DRC are comparable to those in other countries. The study provides valuable information for practitioners and policymakers making rational, evidence-based decisions to control gHAT.Author summary: In the fight against Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a devastating disease transmitted by tsetse flies, significant progress has been made through international efforts. Despite the annual cases being reduced to under 1,000, the World Health Organization aims to eliminate gHAT transmission by 2030. A key component of this strategy involves innovative approaches, such as the use of Tiny Targets–small, cost-effective, insecticide-treated screens that attract and kill tsetse flies. This study focuses on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which bears a substantial burden of gHAT cases, estimating the annual cost of vector control using Tiny Targets in the Yasa Bonga health district. The analysis, conducted from the provider’s perspective, reveals an annual economic cost of 120,000 USD for protecting a 1,925 km2 area. This translates to 5.30 USD per target used, 11 USD per target deployed, 573 USD per linear km treated, and 62 USD per km2 protected. These findings, comparable to costs in other countries, offer valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers, guiding evidence-based decisions on cost-effective strategies for gHAT control.
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011959 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id ... 11959&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011959
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011959
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosntds ().