Impact and cost-effectiveness of water, sanitation, hygiene, and health education interventions in the control and elimination of soil-transmitted helminthiasis: A scoping review

Collins Okoyo, Michael Odhiambo, Geofrey Chepchieng, John Kioko, Britney Nyanchama, Michelle Anjela, Charles Mwandawiro and Mark Minnery

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2026, vol. 20, issue 8, 1-11

Abstract: Background: Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) remains a major public health problem in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) despite widespread implementation of mass drug administration (MDA). Rapid reinfection after treatment highlights the limitations of MDA approaches and underscores the need for complementary interventions. Water, sanitation, hygiene, and health education (WASH) interventions are widely promoted as essential components of integrated STH control strategies. However, evidence on WASH impact and cost-effectiveness remains fragmented and is poorly synthesized. This scoping review aimed to systematically map and summarize the evidence on the impact and cost-effectiveness of WASH interventions for STH control and elimination. Methods: Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature with no date restrictions. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for papers that met our inclusion criteria. Studies assessing the impact and/or cost-effectiveness of WASH interventions, alone or integrated with MDA, on STH outcomes were included. Principal findings: Sixteen studies, predominantly from LMICs, met the inclusion criteria, with Kenya contributing the largest number. Findings showed that combining WASH interventions with MDA led to greater reductions in reinfection with Ascaris lumbricoides than MDA alone, particularly in school- and community-based programs. However, behavioural improvements alone were insufficient without supporting infrastructure, and their effects on other helminths were inconsistent. Notably, only one study conducted a formal cost-effectiveness analysis of WASH interventions, revealing a critical gap in economic evidence. Conclusion: Integrating WASH interventions with MDA can enhance STH control outcomes, particularly for A. lumbricoides, but the lack of robust economic evaluations limits informed policy and investment decisions. Future research should prioritize cost-effectiveness analyses and long-term assessments of integrated WASH strategies to support sustainable STH elimination efforts. Author summary: We carried out a scoping review to examine how water, sanitation, hygiene, and health education (WASH) interventions influence soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) and whether they are cost-effective. Using a systematic approach, we identified 16 studies, most from low- and middle-income countries where WASH services are often limited. The majority of studies focused on roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), with fewer addressing whipworm (Trichuris trichiura) and hookworm. We found that combining WASH interventions with mass drug administration (MDA) improved control of Ascaris lumbricoides compared to MDA alone. Hygiene education by itself was rarely enough without improved sanitation or water infrastructure, and the effects on other STH parasites were mixed. Very few studies assessed costs or cost-effectiveness, leaving important gaps in evidence for guiding investments. Our findings point to the need for integrating WASH strategies into routine MDA programs and for stronger collaboration among governments, non-governmental organizations, and communities. Expanding economic research will be essential to support decisions that can reduce infections and improve health outcomes. By highlighting these gaps, we provide evidence that can inform sustainable approaches to controlling and eventually eliminating STH in vulnerable populations.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014664 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id ... 14664&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014664

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014664

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosntds ().