The Influence of Clinical Information in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Neoplasms
Gerardo Ferrara,
Zsolt Argenyi,
Giuseppe Argenziano,
Rino Cerio,
Lorenzo Cerroni,
Arturo Di Blasi,
Elisa A A Feudale,
Caterina M Giorgio,
Cesare Massone,
Oscar Nappi,
Carlo Tomasini,
Carmelo Urso,
Iris Zalaudek,
Harald Kittler and
H Peter Soyer
PLOS ONE, 2009, vol. 4, issue 4, 1-7
Abstract:
Background: We tested the relevance of clinical information in the histopathologic evaluation of melanocytic skin neoplasm (MSN). Methods: Histopathologic specimens from 99 clinically atypical MSN were circulated among ten histopathologists; each case had clinical information available in a database with a five-step procedure (no information; age/sex/location; clinical diagnosis; clinical image; dermoscopic image); each step had a histopathologic diagnosis (D1 through D5); each diagnostic step had a level of diagnostic confidence (LDC) ranging from 1 (no diagnostic certainty) to 5 (absolute diagnostic certainty). The comparison of the LDC was employed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Findings: In D1 (no information), 36/99 cases (36.3%) had unanimous diagnosis; in D5 (full information available), 51/99 cases (51.5%) had unanimous diagnosis (p for difference between proportions
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005375 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 05375&type=printable (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0005375
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005375
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().