Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals with Discordant Reviews

Bruno Giraudeau, Clémence Leyrat, Amélie Le Gouge, Julie Léger and Agnès Caille

PLOS ONE, 2011, vol. 6, issue 11, 1-3

Abstract: Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose a simple method to identify such proposals. Our approach is based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, which is usually used in assessing agreement in studies with continuous ratings.

Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027557 (text/html)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id= ... 27557&type=printable (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:plo:pone00:0027557

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027557

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in PLOS ONE from Public Library of Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by plosone ().